Book Review: The Girl Who Kicked the Hornet’s Nest

The Girl Who Kicked the Hornet’s Nest by Stieg Larsson, Alfred A. Knopf, New York, 2010

As regular readers of this blog may remember, I posted reviews of the first two books in Stieg Larsson’s “Millenium” series late last year.  Frugal to a fault, I’ve been waiting to write a review of the third book until it came out in paperback.  My wait came to an unexpected and happy end on Christmas, when I received a Kindle Touch from my wife and an Amazon.com gift card from my older son and daughter-in-law.  Here then is my long-delayed review of The Girl Who Kicked the Hornet’s Nest.

The third installment of Stieg Larsson’s Millennium series begins where the second one ends.  Lisbeth Salander has been shot by Zalachenko, and is airlifted to Sahlgrenska Hospital in Göteborg with bullet wounds in her head, hip, and shoulder.  The surgery to save her life is successful, but her recovery is a lengthy one.

The reader spends much of Salander’s convalescence happily anticipating her trial, but before we get there, we must wend our way through several subplots.  One concerns The Section, an ultra-secret branch of Swedish Internal Security, and a group within The Section charged with handling the defector Zalachenko.  Another involves Erika Berger’s move to Sweden’s largest daily newspaper, Svenska Morgon-Posten, and a determined stalker she encounters there.

As interesting as these subplots are, I found myself growing impatient to get back to Salander’s story.  I began to wish – as I had during The Girl Who Played with Fire – that Larsson had engaged the services of a judicious editor.  Before he actually gets back to Salander, however, I realized that hers is not the only story here.  Larsson wants to tell us about Blomqvist too, obviously, as well as Berger, Annika Giannini, Monica Figuerola, Susanne Linder, and others.  I get the feeling that once he set his characters in motion, he had no choice but to run after them as fast as he could, writing down everything they say and do.  Perhaps the breadth of Larsson’s story stems from his background as a journalist, which required him to report everything with minimal editing.  It’s all important to Larsson, and ultimately, to us too.

In any case, Larsson structures events in such a way as to create a suspense that is positively palpable, and a climax that is exceptionally satisfying.  The loose ends of the story – the tangled strands of the plots and subplots – are all masterfully resolved.

I am generally not a reader of popular fiction – there are still so many classics that I have yet to read – but I have made a three-fold exception in the case of the Millennium trilogy.  Why does Millennium matter?  First, I can’t help but admire Larsson’s ability to bring his characters to life.  They are, in a word, unforgettable, and I want to know them better and to share my enthusiasm for them with others, though given the enormous popularity of the series, my contribution in this area is hardly necessary.

Foremost among his creations is of course Lisbeth Salander.  As Blomqvist says, Lisbeth is “…certainly unique, and she’s the most antisocial person I’ve ever known.”  Although true, this is not the whole story.  Observing Lisbeth’s growth is one of the most rewarding aspects of the trilogy.  The line that reveals it best is something Lisbeth says to Annika Giannini: “I…I’m not good at relationships.  But I do trust you.”  This is a defining moment for Lisbeth, and certainly not something she would have said at the beginning of The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo.

Second, Millenium matters because of Larsson’s realism.  His characters and plots all have an unmistakable ring of truth to them.  Not only do we enjoy his series, we can learn from it.

Finally, Millenium matters because of the relevance of its themes, the most important of which is the hatred that some men – many men – feel toward women.  As Blomkvist himself says, “When it comes down to it, this story is not primarily about spies and secret government agencies; it’s about violence against women, and the men who enable it.”  Lisbeth Salander becomes a heroic figure because of her uncompromising fight against this hatred, and her ultimate triumph over it.

As important as this theme is, however, we should keep in mind that Larsson’s view of men is primarily a positive one.  For every man in this trilogy who hates women, there are at least two who treat them with love and respect.

There is one more significant theme.  Larsson was a career journalist and investigative reporter, and well aware that governments are likely to confuse what is right with what is merely self-serving.  They are more than capable of lying to their citizenry, and engaging in massive cover-ups and disinformation campaigns.  As citizens, we need to be aware of this, and strive to distinguish the lies from the truth.  The difficulty, of course, lies in knowing whom to believe.  News outlets are all biased to some degree.  The news they choose to report and the way they report it are all influenced by that bias.  We ourselves are biased too, no matter how strenuously we might deny it.  What we see and hear is inevitably filtered through our biases.  Would we know the truth if we heard it?  How can we be sure?

At one point, the question is put to Blomkvist: “How is it possible that civil servants in the Swedish government will go so far as to commit murder?”  He responds, “The only reasonable explanation I can give is that over the years the Section developed into a cult in the true sense of the word.  They became like Knutby, or the pastor Jim Jones, or something like that.  They write their own laws, within which concepts like right and wrong have ceased to be relevant.  And through these laws they imagine themselves isolated from normal society.”

There are times, Larsson is saying, when it pays to be paranoid.

We can well regret that Larsson died after completing just three of ten projected books in this series.  He died in 2004, with a 4th novel 2/3 completed, according to those who knew him best.  Personally, I’m sorry that we never get to meet Lisbeth’s twin sister Camilla, and that the relationship between Blomqvist and Monica Figuerola isn’t given more of an opportunity to develop.  On the other hand, I’m grateful for what we have, and that the series doesn’t end with a cliffhanger.  What we have is a complete story, and a captivating one at that.

Derrick Robinson

Advertisements
Published in: on December 31, 2011 at 5:32 pm  Leave a Comment  
Tags: ,

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: https://derricksblog.wordpress.com/2011/12/31/book-review-the-girl-who-kicked-the-hornets-nest/trackback/

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: